Variations in Low Intensity Shockwave Treatment Protocols for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature and Guide to Offering Treatment

Solomon Hayon, Evan J. Panken, Nelson E. Bennett*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) continues to gain popularity in both clinical practice and the academic literature. The majority of trials and meta-analysis studies have shown LiSWT to be low risk with a trend toward positive improvements in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores. However, there is still debate over the clinical utility of LiSWT and there is no agreed upon optimal treatment protocol. In this review article we summarize published meta-analysis studies of LiSWT for ED, and review the treatment protocols from randomized sham-control trials published in the last 10 years. We found the most common device settings were an energy of 0.09 mJ/mm2 and a frequency of 5 Hz. Shock number and location varied, but the most common protocol was 1,500 shocks per session, with 900 shocks to the penis (shaft, base, or hilum) and 600 shocks to the proximal corpora/crura. Protocols ranged from 4 to 12 treatment sessions. We also describe our institutional experience with LiSWT, including patient counseling and treatment protocol.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number230105
JournalWorld Journal of Men's Health
Volume41
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Hypertension
  • Phosphodiesterase inhibitors
  • Sexual dysfunction, physiological

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Aging
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Urology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variations in Low Intensity Shockwave Treatment Protocols for Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature and Guide to Offering Treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this