Abstract
In this article, we estimate the potential energy benefits of lightweighting the light-duty vehicle fleet from both vehicle manufacturing and use perspectives using plausible lightweight vehicle designs involving several alternative lightweight materials, low- and high-end estimates of vehicle manufacturing energy, conventional and alternative powertrains, and two different market penetration scenarios for alternative powertrain light-duty vehicles at the fleet level. Cumulative life cycle energy savings (through 2050) across the nine material scenarios based on the conventional powertrain in the U.S. vehicle fleet range from -. 29 to 94 billion GJ, with the greatest savings achieved by multi-material vehicles that select different lightweight materials to meet specific design purposes. Lightweighting alternative-powertrain vehicles could produce significant energy savings in the U.S. vehicle fleet, although their improved powertrain efficiencies lessen the energy savings opportunities for lightweighting. A maximum level of cumulative energy savings of lightweighting the U.S. light-duty vehicle through 2050 is estimated to be 66.1billion GJ under the conventional-vehicle dominated business-as-usual penetration scenario.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5-13 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Sustainable Materials and Technologies |
Volume | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1 2016 |
Funding
This research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office .
Keywords
- Alternative Vehicle Powertrain
- Life Cycle Energy
- Lightweight Materials
- Vehicle Fleet Energy
- Vehicle Lightweighting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- General Materials Science
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering