Veil of ignorance: Tunnel constructivism in free speech theory

Andrew Koppelman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Modern free speech theory is dominated in the courts and the academy alike by a constructivist style of reasoning: it posits a few axiomatic purposes of speech and from these deduces detailed rules of law. This way of thinking can make the law blind to the actual consequences of legal rules and damage both individual liberty and democracy. I develop this claim through a critique of the work of Martin Redish, who has developed the most sustained and sophisticated constructivist theory of free speech. Free speech constructivism is not the only way to understand the First Amendment. It is a fairly recent development, emerging only in the 1970s. The idea of free speech, on the other hand, dates back to Milton's arguments in the 1640s. This Article identifies the pathologies of constructivism and recovers an older, more attractive free speech tradition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-730
Number of pages84
JournalNorthwestern University law review
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 17 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Veil of ignorance: Tunnel constructivism in free speech theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this