Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse

Karlyn A. Martin*, Kenzie A. Cameron, Madison J. Lyleroehr, Jeffrey A. Linder, Matt O'Brien, Lisa R. Hirschhorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Evidenced-based interventions have been developed to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, including VTE-risk assessment for all patients and targeted primary thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Despite supportive evidence and recommendations, oncologists rarely assess VTE risk or provide primary prophylaxis. Our previous work identified barriers and facilitators to using VTE prevention interventions in oncology practice. Objectives: To identify potential strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators to achieve successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for VTE prevention in oncology practice. Methods: We used the Implementation Research Logic Model, an implementation science framework, to map the relationships among barriers and facilitators, feasible and effective implementation strategies, and implementation and clinical outcomes that will be used to evaluate the implementation strategies. Results: We identified 12 discrete implementation strategies (eg, conducting clinician education and training and staged implementation scale-up) that address barriers and leverage facilitators through their mechanisms of action (eg, increased clinician awareness of evidence and targeting the highest effectiveness). We identified key implementation (eg, penetration, adoption, acceptability, fidelity, appropriateness, and sustainability), system (eg, integration of VTE-risk assessment into clinical workflow), and clinical (eg, lower VTE rates) outcomes targeted by the selected strategies. Conclusion: Using the Implementation Research Logic Model framework and building on our knowledge of barriers and facilitators, we identified implementation strategies and important outcomes to evaluate these strategies. We will use these results to test and measure the strategies to improve the uptake of evidence-based recommendations for VTE prevention in oncology practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102173
JournalResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Funding

This work was supported by an Institutional Grant (IRG-18-163-24) from the American Cancer Society (K.A.M.). K.A.M. is supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ( K23HL157758 ). J.A.L. is supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (P30AG059988, R01AG069762, R01AG074245, P30AG024968, R01AG070054, and R33AG057395) and the Agency for Health care Research and Quality (R01HS026506 and R01HS028127).

Keywords

  • evidence-based practice
  • implementation science
  • neoplasms
  • risk assessment
  • venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Venous thromboembolism prevention in cancer care: implementation strategies to address underuse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this