VEnture Capital And Innovation: Which Is First?

Masayuki Hirukawa, Masako Ueda*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Policy-makers typically interpret positive relations between venture capital (VC) investments and innovations as evidence that VC investments stimulate innovation (VC-first hypothesis). This interpretation is, however, one-sided because there may be a reverse causality that innovations induce VC investments (innovation-first hypothesis): an arrival of new technology increases demand for VC. We analyze this causality issue of VC and innovation in the US manufacturing industry using both total factor productivity growth and patent counts as measures of innovation. We find that, consistent with the innovation-first hypothesis, total factor productivity growth is often positively and significantly related with future VC investment. We find little evidence that supports the VC-first hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-465
Number of pages45
JournalPacific Economic Review
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'VEnture Capital And Innovation: Which Is First?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this