VII. Meta-analysis of calcium supplementation for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Beverley Shea, George Wells, Ann Cranney, Nicole Zytaruk, Vivian Robinson, Lauren Griffith, Zulma Ortiz, Joan Peterson, Jonathan Adachi, Peter Tugwell, Gordon Guyatt*, Jessie McGowan, Bruce Weaver, Andrew Willan, Clifford J. Rosen, John P. Bilezikian, Dennis M. Black, Murray J. Favus, Lorraine A. Fitzpatrick, Douglas P. KielRobert Marcus, Eric S. Orwoll, Thomas J. Schnitzer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

340 Scopus citations


Objective: To summarize controlled trials examining the effect of calcium on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Data Source: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 1998 and the Cochrane Controlled Register up to 2000, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies, and primary authors for unpublished data. Study Selection: We included 15 trials (1806 patients) that randomized postmenopausal women to calcium supplementation or usual calcium intake in the diet and reported bone mineral density of the total body, vertebral spine, hip, or forearm, or recorded the number of fractures, and followed patients for at least 1 yr. Data Extraction: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and extracted data. Data Synthesis: We found calcium to be more effective than placebo in reducing rates of bone loss after two or more years of treatment. The pooled difference in percentage change from baseline was 2.05% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-3.86] for total body bone density, 1.66% (95% CI 0.92-2.39) for the lumbar spine, 1.64% (95% CI 0.70-2.57) for the hip, and 1.91% (95% CI 0.33-3.50) for the distal radius. The relative risk (RR) of fractures of the vertebrae was 0.77, with a wide CI (95% CI 0.54-1.09); the RR for nonvertebral fractures was 0.86 (95% CI 0.43-1.72). Conclusions: Calcium supplementation alone has a small positive effect on bone density. The data show a trend toward reduction in vertebral fractures, but do not meaningfully address the possible effect of calcium on reducing the incidence of nonvertebral fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)552-559
Number of pages8
JournalEndocrine reviews
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology


Dive into the research topics of 'VII. Meta-analysis of calcium supplementation for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this