Voting for protection

Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior?

Bruce A. Blonigen, David N Figlio

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The political economy of trade protection has long been of interest to economists and policy makers. The idea that levels of protection may be endogenous with trade flows has been a particularly important issue in the literature. In general, the endogenous protection literature postulates that import penetration will cause domestic interests to lobby more intensely for protection. Thus, higher levels of import penetration lead to increased protection. As a result, a number of papers (see, for example, Arye L. Hillman, 1982; Wolfgang Mayer, 1984; Robert E. Baldwin, 1985; Stephen P. Magee et al., 1989; Ronald D. Fischer, 1992) have established that foreign firms will import less under a regime of endogenous protection than one where the level of protection is exogenous to trade flows. On the empirical side, Daniel Trefler (1993) finds that ignoring the endogeneity of trade and protection understates the impact of U.S. protection on imports by a magnitude of ten.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationForeign Direct Investment
PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co.
Pages447-471
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9789813277014
ISBN (Print)9789813277007
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

direct investment
foreign investment
import
voting
lobby
economist
political economy
regime
firm
cause
Voting
Direct foreign investment
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Blonigen, B. A., & Figlio, D. N. (2019). Voting for protection: Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior? In Foreign Direct Investment (pp. 447-471). World Scientific Publishing Co.. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813277014_0013
Blonigen, Bruce A. ; Figlio, David N. / Voting for protection : Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior?. Foreign Direct Investment. World Scientific Publishing Co., 2019. pp. 447-471
@inbook{d32ec51382ae40cda75e6e90a79c1986,
title = "Voting for protection: Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior?",
abstract = "The political economy of trade protection has long been of interest to economists and policy makers. The idea that levels of protection may be endogenous with trade flows has been a particularly important issue in the literature. In general, the endogenous protection literature postulates that import penetration will cause domestic interests to lobby more intensely for protection. Thus, higher levels of import penetration lead to increased protection. As a result, a number of papers (see, for example, Arye L. Hillman, 1982; Wolfgang Mayer, 1984; Robert E. Baldwin, 1985; Stephen P. Magee et al., 1989; Ronald D. Fischer, 1992) have established that foreign firms will import less under a regime of endogenous protection than one where the level of protection is exogenous to trade flows. On the empirical side, Daniel Trefler (1993) finds that ignoring the endogeneity of trade and protection understates the impact of U.S. protection on imports by a magnitude of ten.",
author = "Blonigen, {Bruce A.} and Figlio, {David N}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1142/9789813277014_0013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9789813277007",
pages = "447--471",
booktitle = "Foreign Direct Investment",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co.",

}

Blonigen, BA & Figlio, DN 2019, Voting for protection: Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior? in Foreign Direct Investment. World Scientific Publishing Co., pp. 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813277014_0013

Voting for protection : Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior? / Blonigen, Bruce A.; Figlio, David N.

Foreign Direct Investment. World Scientific Publishing Co., 2019. p. 447-471.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Voting for protection

T2 - Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior?

AU - Blonigen, Bruce A.

AU - Figlio, David N

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The political economy of trade protection has long been of interest to economists and policy makers. The idea that levels of protection may be endogenous with trade flows has been a particularly important issue in the literature. In general, the endogenous protection literature postulates that import penetration will cause domestic interests to lobby more intensely for protection. Thus, higher levels of import penetration lead to increased protection. As a result, a number of papers (see, for example, Arye L. Hillman, 1982; Wolfgang Mayer, 1984; Robert E. Baldwin, 1985; Stephen P. Magee et al., 1989; Ronald D. Fischer, 1992) have established that foreign firms will import less under a regime of endogenous protection than one where the level of protection is exogenous to trade flows. On the empirical side, Daniel Trefler (1993) finds that ignoring the endogeneity of trade and protection understates the impact of U.S. protection on imports by a magnitude of ten.

AB - The political economy of trade protection has long been of interest to economists and policy makers. The idea that levels of protection may be endogenous with trade flows has been a particularly important issue in the literature. In general, the endogenous protection literature postulates that import penetration will cause domestic interests to lobby more intensely for protection. Thus, higher levels of import penetration lead to increased protection. As a result, a number of papers (see, for example, Arye L. Hillman, 1982; Wolfgang Mayer, 1984; Robert E. Baldwin, 1985; Stephen P. Magee et al., 1989; Ronald D. Fischer, 1992) have established that foreign firms will import less under a regime of endogenous protection than one where the level of protection is exogenous to trade flows. On the empirical side, Daniel Trefler (1993) finds that ignoring the endogeneity of trade and protection understates the impact of U.S. protection on imports by a magnitude of ten.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068044205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068044205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/9789813277014_0013

DO - 10.1142/9789813277014_0013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789813277007

SP - 447

EP - 471

BT - Foreign Direct Investment

PB - World Scientific Publishing Co.

ER -

Blonigen BA, Figlio DN. Voting for protection: Does direct foreign investment influence legislator behavior? In Foreign Direct Investment. World Scientific Publishing Co. 2019. p. 447-471 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813277014_0013