TY - JOUR
T1 - Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men
T2 - A randomized clinical trial
AU - Fitzgibbons, Robert J.
AU - Giobbie-Hurder, Anita
AU - Gibbs, James O.
AU - Dunlop, Dorothy D.
AU - Reda, Domenic J.
AU - McCarthy, Martin
AU - Neumayer, Leigh A.
AU - Barkun, Jeffrey S.T.
AU - Hoehn, James L.
AU - Murphy, Joseph T.
AU - Sarosi, George A.
AU - Syme, William C.
AU - Thompson, Jon S.
AU - Wang, Jia
AU - Jonasson, Olga
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/1/18
Y1 - 2006/1/18
N2 - Context: Many men with inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring surgical repair is a safe and acceptable option has not been assessed. Objective: To compare pain and the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Version 2 survey at 2 years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias treated with watchful waiting or surgical repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized trial conducted January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2004, at 5 North American centers and enrolling 720 men (364 watchful waiting, 356 surgical repair) followed up for 2 to 4.5 years. Interventions: Watchful-waiting patients were followed up at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms; repair patients received standard open tensionfree repair and were followed up at 3 and 6 months and annually. Main Outcome Measures: Pain and discomfort interfering with usual activities at 2 years and change in PCS from baseline to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were complications, patient-reported pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care. Results: Primary intention-to-treat outcomes were similar at 2 years for watchful waiting vs surgical repair: pain limiting activities (5.1% vs 2.2%, respectively; P=.52); PCS (improvement over baseline, 0.29 points vs 0.13 points; P=.79). Twenty-three percent of patients assigned to watchful waiting crossed over to receive surgical repair (increase in hernia-related pain was the most common reason offered); 17% assigned to receive repair crossed over to watchful waiting. Self-reported pain in watchful-waiting patients crossing over improved after repair. Occurrence of postoperative hernia-related complications was similar in patients who received repair as assigned and in watchful-waiting patients who crossed over. One watchful-waiting patient (0.3%) experienced acute hernia incarceration without strangulation within 2 years; a second had acute incarceration with bowel obstruction at 4 years, with a frequency of 1.8/1000 patient-years inclusive of patients followed up for as long as 4.5 years. Conclusions: Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms increase is safe because acute hernia incarcerations occur rarely. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263250.
AB - Context: Many men with inguinal hernia have minimal symptoms. Whether deferring surgical repair is a safe and acceptable option has not been assessed. Objective: To compare pain and the physical component score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Version 2 survey at 2 years in men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias treated with watchful waiting or surgical repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized trial conducted January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2004, at 5 North American centers and enrolling 720 men (364 watchful waiting, 356 surgical repair) followed up for 2 to 4.5 years. Interventions: Watchful-waiting patients were followed up at 6 months and annually and watched for hernia symptoms; repair patients received standard open tensionfree repair and were followed up at 3 and 6 months and annually. Main Outcome Measures: Pain and discomfort interfering with usual activities at 2 years and change in PCS from baseline to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were complications, patient-reported pain, functional status, activity levels, and satisfaction with care. Results: Primary intention-to-treat outcomes were similar at 2 years for watchful waiting vs surgical repair: pain limiting activities (5.1% vs 2.2%, respectively; P=.52); PCS (improvement over baseline, 0.29 points vs 0.13 points; P=.79). Twenty-three percent of patients assigned to watchful waiting crossed over to receive surgical repair (increase in hernia-related pain was the most common reason offered); 17% assigned to receive repair crossed over to watchful waiting. Self-reported pain in watchful-waiting patients crossing over improved after repair. Occurrence of postoperative hernia-related complications was similar in patients who received repair as assigned and in watchful-waiting patients who crossed over. One watchful-waiting patient (0.3%) experienced acute hernia incarceration without strangulation within 2 years; a second had acute incarceration with bowel obstruction at 4 years, with a frequency of 1.8/1000 patient-years inclusive of patients followed up for as long as 4.5 years. Conclusions: Watchful waiting is an acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias. Delaying surgical repair until symptoms increase is safe because acute hernia incarcerations occur rarely. Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00263250.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30944436871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30944436871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.295.3.285
DO - 10.1001/jama.295.3.285
M3 - Article
C2 - 16418463
AN - SCOPUS:30944436871
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 295
SP - 285
EP - 292
JO - JAMA
JF - JAMA
IS - 3
ER -