Abstract
Higher education institutions are continuing to develop their capacity for learning analytics (LA), which is a sociotechnical data-mining and analytic practice. Institutions rarely inform their students about LA practices, and there exist significant privacy concerns. Without a clear student voice in the design of LA, institutions put themselves in an ethical gray area. To help fill this gap in practice and add to the growing literature on students' privacy perspectives, this study reports findings from over 100 interviews with undergraduate students at eight U.S. higher education institutions. Findings demonstrate that students lacked awareness of educational data-mining and analytic practices, as well as the data on which they rely. Students see potential in LA, but they presented nuanced arguments about when and with whom data should be shared; they also expressed why informed consent was valuable and necessary. The study uncovered perspectives on institutional trust that were heretofore unknown, as well as what actions might violate that trust. Institutions must balance their desire to implement LA with their obligation to educate students about their analytic practices and treat them as partners in the design of analytic strategies reliant on student data in order to protect their intellectual privacy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1044-1059 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Funding
This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG‐96‐18‐0044‐18). The views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The team thanks its research assistants for their support: Tanisha Afnan (Indiana University‐Indianapolis), Aubree Tillett (University of Wisconsin‐Milwaukee), Susan Rowe (Oregon State University), Ashwed Patil (Indiana University‐Bloomington), and Donovan Pogue (Indiana University‐Bloomington). The team also expresses its thanks to the anonymous peer reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. A version of this article was first published in the 2019 proceedings of the Association of College and Research Libraries' annual meeting. This project was made possible in part by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG-96-18-0044-18). The views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent those of the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The team thanks its research assistants for their support: Tanisha Afnan (Indiana University-Indianapolis), Aubree Tillett (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee), Susan Rowe (Oregon State University), Ashwed Patil (Indiana University-Bloomington), and Donovan Pogue (Indiana University-Bloomington). The team also expresses its thanks to the anonymous peer reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. A version of this article was first published in the 2019 proceedings of the Association of College and Research Libraries' annual meeting.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Information Systems and Management
- Library and Information Sciences