TY - JOUR
T1 - What is feedback in clinical education?
AU - Van De Ridder, J. M.Monica
AU - Stokking, Karel M.
AU - McGaghie, William C.
AU - Ten Cate, Olle Th J.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - Objective: Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research-based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods: A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta-analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results: Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as 'information'; as 'reaction', including information, and as a 'cycle', including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: 'Specific information about the comparison between a trainee's observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee's performance.' Conclusions: Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research-based operational definition are discussed.
AB - Objective: Feedback is important in clinical education. However, the medical education literature provides no consensual definition of feedback. The aim of this study is to propose a consensual, research-based, operational definition of feedback in clinical education. An operational definition is needed for educational practice and teacher training, and for research into the effectiveness of different types of feedback. Methods: A literature search about definitions of feedback was performed in general sources, meta-analyses and literature reviews in the social sciences and other fields. Feedback definitions given from 1995 to 2006 in the medical education literature are also reviewed. Results: Three underlying concepts were found, defining feedback as 'information'; as 'reaction', including information, and as a 'cycle', including both information and reaction. In most medical education and social science literature, feedback is usually conceptualised as information only. Comparison of feedback definitions in medical education reveals at least 9 different features. The following operational definition is proposed. Feedback is: 'Specific information about the comparison between a trainee's observed performance and a standard, given with the intent to improve the trainee's performance.' Conclusions: Different conceptual representations and the use of different key features might be a cause for inconsistent definitions of feedback. The characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of this research-based operational definition are discussed.
KW - feedback
KW - Clinical medicine/education
KW - Education, medical/methods
KW - Review [publication type]
KW - Teaching/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349107605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349107605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 18230092
AN - SCOPUS:38349107605
SN - 0308-0110
VL - 42
SP - 189
EP - 197
JO - Medical education
JF - Medical education
IS - 2
ER -