Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Northwestern Scholars Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Experts
Organizations
Research Output
Grants
Core Facilities
Research Data
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
What Public Comments During Rulemaking Do (and Why)
Brian Libgober
*
, Steven Rashin
*
Corresponding author for this work
Political Science
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
1
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Research Data
(1)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Public Comments During Rulemaking Do (and Why)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Public Comments
100%
High Stakes
100%
Politicians
50%
Federal Regulations
50%
Informational Content
50%
Persuade
50%
Catering
50%
Litigation
50%
Members of the Public
50%
Automatic Coding
50%
Resource Distribution
50%
Policy Choice
50%
Outside Interests
50%
Public Preferences
50%
Re-election
50%
Interest Changes
50%
Policy Consequences
50%
Strategic Actor
50%
Resource Analysis
50%
Social Sciences
Interest Groups
100%
Courts
100%
Incentive
100%
Guides
50%
Legislation
50%
Case Study
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Incentives
100%
Psychology
Case Study
100%