TY - JOUR
T1 - What subcortical-cortical relationships tell us about processing speech in noise
AU - Parbery-Clark, Alexandra
AU - Marmel, Frederic
AU - Bair, Julia
AU - Kraus, Nina
PY - 2011/2/1
Y1 - 2011/2/1
N2 - To advance our understanding of the biological basis of speech-in-noise perception, we investigated the effects of background noise on both subcortical- and cortical-evoked responses, and the relationships between them, in normal hearing young adults. The addition of background noise modulated subcortical and cortical response morphology. In noise, subcortical responses were later, smaller in amplitude and demonstrated decreased neural precision in encoding the speech sound. Cortical responses were also delayed by noise, yet the amplitudes of the major peaks (N1, P2) were affected differently, with N1 increasing and P2 decreasing. Relationships between neural measures and speech-in-noise ability were identified, with earlier subcortical responses, higher subcortical response fidelity and greater cortical N1 response magnitude all relating to better speech-in-noise perception. Furthermore, it was only with the addition of background noise that relationships between subcortical and cortical encoding of speech and the behavioral measures of speech in noise emerged. Results illustrate that human brainstem responses and N1 cortical response amplitude reflect coordinated processes with regards to the perception of speech in noise, thereby acting as a functional index of speech-in-noise perception.
AB - To advance our understanding of the biological basis of speech-in-noise perception, we investigated the effects of background noise on both subcortical- and cortical-evoked responses, and the relationships between them, in normal hearing young adults. The addition of background noise modulated subcortical and cortical response morphology. In noise, subcortical responses were later, smaller in amplitude and demonstrated decreased neural precision in encoding the speech sound. Cortical responses were also delayed by noise, yet the amplitudes of the major peaks (N1, P2) were affected differently, with N1 increasing and P2 decreasing. Relationships between neural measures and speech-in-noise ability were identified, with earlier subcortical responses, higher subcortical response fidelity and greater cortical N1 response magnitude all relating to better speech-in-noise perception. Furthermore, it was only with the addition of background noise that relationships between subcortical and cortical encoding of speech and the behavioral measures of speech in noise emerged. Results illustrate that human brainstem responses and N1 cortical response amplitude reflect coordinated processes with regards to the perception of speech in noise, thereby acting as a functional index of speech-in-noise perception.
KW - Auditory brainstem response
KW - Cortical auditory-evoked potentials
KW - N1
KW - Speech in noise
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251602121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251602121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07546.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07546.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 21255123
AN - SCOPUS:79251602121
SN - 0953-816X
VL - 33
SP - 549
EP - 557
JO - European Journal of Neuroscience
JF - European Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -