What the laws demand of socrates-And of us

Paul Gowder*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In historical and strategic context, the argument of the Laws in Plato's Crito should be understood not as an argument for legal obedience in general, but as an argument against the public display of legal impunity (i.e., procured by bribery). Stable democratic authority requires the threat of mass collective action in support of the rule of law. But that threat is not credible without widespread trust by citizens in their fellows' commitment to the law. Socrates's impunity would have undermined that trust. As a citizen with a stake in the democracy, he had compelling reason not to do so.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)360-374
    Number of pages15
    JournalMonist
    Volume98
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What the laws demand of socrates-And of us'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this