Abstract
As a step towards improving visualization literacy, this work investigates how students approach reading visualizations differently after taking a university-level visualization course. We asked students to verbally walk through their process of making sense of unfamiliar visualizations, and conducted a qualitative analysis of these walkthroughs. Our qualitative analysis found that after taking a visualization course, students engaged with visualizations in more sophisticated ways: they were more likely to exhibit design empathy by thinking critically about the tradeoffs behind why a chart was designed in a particular way, and were better able to deconstruct a chart to make sense of it. We also gave students a quantitative assessment of visualization literacy and found no evidence of scores improving after the class, likely because the test we used focused on a different set of skills than those emphasized in visualization classes. While current measurement instruments for visualization literacy are useful, we propose developing standardized assessments for additional aspects of visualization literacy, such as deconstruction and design empathy. We also suggest that these additional aspects could be incorporated more explicitly in visualization courses.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Funding
The authors wish to thank the instructors of the classes we recruited from, and members of the MU Collective lab for their feedback. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (#2120750).
Keywords
- graph comprehension
- visualization expertise
- Visualization literacy
- visualization pedagogy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Signal Processing
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design