What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification

Andrea Mennicken, Wendy Nelson Espeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Calculation and quantification have been critical features of modern societies, closely linked to science, markets, and administration. In the past thirty years, the pace, purpose, and scope of quantification have greatly expanded, and there has been a corresponding increase in scholarship on quantification. We offer an assessment of the widely dispersed literature on quantification across four domains where quantification and quantification scholarship have particularly flourished: administration, democratic rule, economics, and personal life. In doing so, we seek to stimulate more cross-disciplinary debate and exchange. We caution against unifying accounts of quantification and highlight the importance of tracking quantification across different sites in order to appreciate its essential ambiguity and conduct more systematic investigations of interactions between different quantification regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-245
Number of pages23
JournalAnnual Review of Sociology
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 30 2019

Fingerprint

quantification
regime
market
interaction
science
society

Keywords

  • Quantification
  • commensuration
  • economization
  • politics of visibility
  • quantified self

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{7ac247f330c44c5aad9830eb27d23148,
title = "What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification",
abstract = "Calculation and quantification have been critical features of modern societies, closely linked to science, markets, and administration. In the past thirty years, the pace, purpose, and scope of quantification have greatly expanded, and there has been a corresponding increase in scholarship on quantification. We offer an assessment of the widely dispersed literature on quantification across four domains where quantification and quantification scholarship have particularly flourished: administration, democratic rule, economics, and personal life. In doing so, we seek to stimulate more cross-disciplinary debate and exchange. We caution against unifying accounts of quantification and highlight the importance of tracking quantification across different sites in order to appreciate its essential ambiguity and conduct more systematic investigations of interactions between different quantification regimes.",
keywords = "Quantification, commensuration, economization, politics of visibility, quantified self",
author = "Andrea Mennicken and Espeland, {Wendy Nelson}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "223--245",
journal = "Annual Review of Sociology",
issn = "0360-0572",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification. / Mennicken, Andrea; Espeland, Wendy Nelson.

In: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 45, 30.07.2019, p. 223-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification

AU - Mennicken, Andrea

AU - Espeland, Wendy Nelson

PY - 2019/7/30

Y1 - 2019/7/30

N2 - Calculation and quantification have been critical features of modern societies, closely linked to science, markets, and administration. In the past thirty years, the pace, purpose, and scope of quantification have greatly expanded, and there has been a corresponding increase in scholarship on quantification. We offer an assessment of the widely dispersed literature on quantification across four domains where quantification and quantification scholarship have particularly flourished: administration, democratic rule, economics, and personal life. In doing so, we seek to stimulate more cross-disciplinary debate and exchange. We caution against unifying accounts of quantification and highlight the importance of tracking quantification across different sites in order to appreciate its essential ambiguity and conduct more systematic investigations of interactions between different quantification regimes.

AB - Calculation and quantification have been critical features of modern societies, closely linked to science, markets, and administration. In the past thirty years, the pace, purpose, and scope of quantification have greatly expanded, and there has been a corresponding increase in scholarship on quantification. We offer an assessment of the widely dispersed literature on quantification across four domains where quantification and quantification scholarship have particularly flourished: administration, democratic rule, economics, and personal life. In doing so, we seek to stimulate more cross-disciplinary debate and exchange. We caution against unifying accounts of quantification and highlight the importance of tracking quantification across different sites in order to appreciate its essential ambiguity and conduct more systematic investigations of interactions between different quantification regimes.

KW - Quantification

KW - commensuration

KW - economization

KW - politics of visibility

KW - quantified self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069760257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069760257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343

DO - 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069760257

VL - 45

SP - 223

EP - 245

JO - Annual Review of Sociology

JF - Annual Review of Sociology

SN - 0360-0572

ER -