When does atomic resolution plan view imaging of surfaces work?

Pratik Koirala, Yuyuan Lin, Jim Ciston, Laurence D. Marks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Surface structures that are different from the corresponding bulk, reconstructions, are exceedingly difficult to characterize with most experimental methods. Scanning tunneling microscopy, the workhorse for imaging complex surface structures of metals and semiconductors, is not as effective for oxides and other insulating materials. This paper details the use of transmission electron microscopy plan view imaging in conjunction with image processing for solving complex surface structures. We address the issue of extracting the surface structure from a weak signal with a large bulk contribution. This method requires the sample to be thin enough for kinematical assumptions to be valid. The analysis was performed on two sets of data, c(6×2) on the (100) surface and (3×3) on the (111) surface of SrTiO3, and was unsuccessful in the latter due to the thickness of the sample and a lack of inversion symmetry. The limits and the functionality of this method are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-42
Number of pages8
JournalUltramicroscopy
Volume170
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Keywords

  • Plan view imaging
  • Surface reconstruction
  • Transmission electron microscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Instrumentation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When does atomic resolution plan view imaging of surfaces work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this