“When information is not enough”: A model for understanding BRCA-positive previvors’ information needs regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk

Marleah Dean*, Courtney L. Scherr, Meredith Clements, Rachel Koruo, Jennifer Martinez, Amy Ross

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate BRCA-positive, unaffected patients’ – referred to as previvors – information needs after testing positive for a deleterious BRCA genetic mutation. Methods 25 qualitative interviews were conducted with previvors. Data were analyzed using the constant comparison method of grounded theory. Results Analysis revealed a theoretical model of previvors’ information needs related to the stage of their health journey. Specifically, a four-stage model was developed based on the data: (1) pre-testing information needs, (2) post-testing information needs, (3) pre-management information needs, and (4) post-management information needs. Two recurring dimensions of desired knowledge also emerged within the stages—personal/social knowledge and medical knowledge. Conclusions While previvors may be genetically predisposed to develop cancer, they have not been diagnosed with cancer, and therefore have different information needs than cancer patients and cancer survivors. Practice Implications This model can serve as a framework for assisting healthcare providers in meeting the specific information needs of cancer previvors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1738-1743
Number of pages6
JournalPatient education and counseling
Volume100
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Keywords

  • BRCA
  • Decision-making
  • Genetics
  • Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
  • Information
  • Previvors
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“When information is not enough”: A model for understanding BRCA-positive previvors’ information needs regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this