TY - JOUR
T1 - When is your surgeon good enough? When do you need a "referent surgeon"?
AU - McCarthy, Patrick M.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients at an experienced center, assuming the likelihood for repair is ≥ 90%. This has raised the question of how you define an experienced center (or surgeon). This article describes thoughts on the criteria that should make up a Center of Excellence: surgical training; intraoperative echocardiography; high volume; cardiology involvement; audit of clinical outcomes and outcomes of repair; and associated surgery for atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. High-volume programs (≥ 140 mitral valve operations per year) have the lowest mortality and highest repair rate. Although some pathologic conditions may be repaired with a high degree of certainty by experienced (nonreferent) surgeons, considerable variation still exists. Recent publications of repair rates and outcomes using minimally invasive surgery and conventional surgery highlight this variability.
AB - Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients at an experienced center, assuming the likelihood for repair is ≥ 90%. This has raised the question of how you define an experienced center (or surgeon). This article describes thoughts on the criteria that should make up a Center of Excellence: surgical training; intraoperative echocardiography; high volume; cardiology involvement; audit of clinical outcomes and outcomes of repair; and associated surgery for atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. High-volume programs (≥ 140 mitral valve operations per year) have the lowest mortality and highest repair rate. Although some pathologic conditions may be repaired with a high degree of certainty by experienced (nonreferent) surgeons, considerable variation still exists. Recent publications of repair rates and outcomes using minimally invasive surgery and conventional surgery highlight this variability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63449104042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63449104042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11886-009-0017-9
DO - 10.1007/s11886-009-0017-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19236826
AN - SCOPUS:63449104042
SN - 1523-3782
VL - 11
SP - 107
EP - 113
JO - Current Cardiology Reports
JF - Current Cardiology Reports
IS - 2
ER -