When Oral Consent Will Do

Elisa J. Gordon

doi:10.1177/1525822X0001200304

When Oral Consent Will Do

Elisa J. Gordon^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Surgery, Transplant Surgery Division

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Informed consent in research requires investigators to explain to potential participants the procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives of a study through either oral or written consent. This article discusses cases when oral consent may be more appropriate to use than written consent. A proposal is presented for writing Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols that incorporate both types of consent to protect the interests of participants and investigators.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	235-238
Number of pages	4
Journal	Field Methods
Volume	12
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0001200304
State	Published - Jan 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Anthropology

Access to Document

10.1177/1525822X0001200304

Cite this

@article{1184366a7d4e45f9b0b009055eb4d6ec,

title = "When Oral Consent Will Do",

abstract = "Informed consent in research requires investigators to explain to potential participants the procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives of a study through either oral or written consent. This article discusses cases when oral consent may be more appropriate to use than written consent. A proposal is presented for writing Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols that incorporate both types of consent to protect the interests of participants and investigators.",

author = "Gordon, {Elisa J.}",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1525822X0001200304",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "12",

pages = "235--238",

journal = "Field Methods",

issn = "1525-822X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Oral Consent Will Do

AU - Gordon, Elisa J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Informed consent in research requires investigators to explain to potential participants the procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives of a study through either oral or written consent. This article discusses cases when oral consent may be more appropriate to use than written consent. A proposal is presented for writing Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols that incorporate both types of consent to protect the interests of participants and investigators.

AB - Informed consent in research requires investigators to explain to potential participants the procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives of a study through either oral or written consent. This article discusses cases when oral consent may be more appropriate to use than written consent. A proposal is presented for writing Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocols that incorporate both types of consent to protect the interests of participants and investigators.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996198884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996198884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1525822X0001200304

DO - 10.1177/1525822X0001200304

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84996198884

SN - 1525-822X

VL - 12

SP - 235

EP - 238

JO - Field Methods

JF - Field Methods

IS - 3

ER -

When Oral Consent Will Do

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this