When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism

Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, Scott Akalis, John T. Cacioppo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 149 Citations

Abstract

We propose that the tendency to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents is determined primarily by three factors (Epley, Waytz, & Cacioppo, 2007), two of which we test here: sociality motivation and effectance motivation. This theory makes unique predictions about dispositional, situational, cultural, and developmental variability in anthropomorphism, and we test two predictions about dispositional and situational influences stemming from both of these motivations. In particular, we test whether those who are dispositionally lonely (sociality motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize well-known pets (Study 1), and whether those who have a stable need for control (effectance motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize apparently unpredictable animals (Study 2). Both studies are consistent with our predictions. We suggest that this theory of anthropomorphism can help to explain when people are likely to attribute humanlike traits to nonhuman agents, and provides insight into the inverse process of dehumanization in which people fail to attribute human characteristics to other humans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-155
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Motivation
Dehumanization
Pets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

When we need a human : Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. / Epley, Nicholas; Waytz, Adam; Akalis, Scott; Cacioppo, John T.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, p. 143-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epley, Nicholas; Waytz, Adam; Akalis, Scott; Cacioppo, John T. / When we need a human : Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008, p. 143-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5a39e3bdf884132a9e476aa6b378e2b,
title = "When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism",
abstract = "We propose that the tendency to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents is determined primarily by three factors (Epley, Waytz, & Cacioppo, 2007), two of which we test here: sociality motivation and effectance motivation. This theory makes unique predictions about dispositional, situational, cultural, and developmental variability in anthropomorphism, and we test two predictions about dispositional and situational influences stemming from both of these motivations. In particular, we test whether those who are dispositionally lonely (sociality motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize well-known pets (Study 1), and whether those who have a stable need for control (effectance motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize apparently unpredictable animals (Study 2). Both studies are consistent with our predictions. We suggest that this theory of anthropomorphism can help to explain when people are likely to attribute humanlike traits to nonhuman agents, and provides insight into the inverse process of dehumanization in which people fail to attribute human characteristics to other humans.",
author = "Nicholas Epley and Adam Waytz and Scott Akalis and Cacioppo, {John T.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143",
volume = "26",
pages = "143--155",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When we need a human

T2 - Social Cognition

AU - Epley,Nicholas

AU - Waytz,Adam

AU - Akalis,Scott

AU - Cacioppo,John T.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - We propose that the tendency to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents is determined primarily by three factors (Epley, Waytz, & Cacioppo, 2007), two of which we test here: sociality motivation and effectance motivation. This theory makes unique predictions about dispositional, situational, cultural, and developmental variability in anthropomorphism, and we test two predictions about dispositional and situational influences stemming from both of these motivations. In particular, we test whether those who are dispositionally lonely (sociality motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize well-known pets (Study 1), and whether those who have a stable need for control (effectance motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize apparently unpredictable animals (Study 2). Both studies are consistent with our predictions. We suggest that this theory of anthropomorphism can help to explain when people are likely to attribute humanlike traits to nonhuman agents, and provides insight into the inverse process of dehumanization in which people fail to attribute human characteristics to other humans.

AB - We propose that the tendency to anthropomorphize nonhuman agents is determined primarily by three factors (Epley, Waytz, & Cacioppo, 2007), two of which we test here: sociality motivation and effectance motivation. This theory makes unique predictions about dispositional, situational, cultural, and developmental variability in anthropomorphism, and we test two predictions about dispositional and situational influences stemming from both of these motivations. In particular, we test whether those who are dispositionally lonely (sociality motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize well-known pets (Study 1), and whether those who have a stable need for control (effectance motivation) are more likely to anthropomorphize apparently unpredictable animals (Study 2). Both studies are consistent with our predictions. We suggest that this theory of anthropomorphism can help to explain when people are likely to attribute humanlike traits to nonhuman agents, and provides insight into the inverse process of dehumanization in which people fail to attribute human characteristics to other humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61649124055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61649124055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143

DO - 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 143

EP - 155

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 2

ER -