TY - JOUR
T1 - Who Benefits from Repealing Tampon Taxes? Empirical Evidence from New Jersey
AU - Cotropia, Christopher
AU - Rozema, Kyle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Cornell Law School and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Many state and local governments exclude some medical products from the sales tax base, including some that are primarily used by men such as hair growth products. However, tampons and other menstrual hygiene products are subject to sales taxes in most states. A recent social movement advocates for the repeal of these “tampon taxes” and several class action lawsuits have been filed against states citing equal protection violations. In this article, we use the 2005 elimination of menstrual hygiene products from the sales tax base in New Jersey as a natural experiment to study who benefits from the repeal of tampon taxes. We find that the tax break is fully shifted to consumers, but that the tax break is not distributed equally. Low-income consumers enjoy a benefit from the repeal of the tax by more than the size of the repealed tax. For high-income consumers, the tax break is shared equally with producers. The results suggest that repealing tampon taxes removes an unequal tax burden and could make menstrual hygiene products more accessible for low-income consumers.
AB - Many state and local governments exclude some medical products from the sales tax base, including some that are primarily used by men such as hair growth products. However, tampons and other menstrual hygiene products are subject to sales taxes in most states. A recent social movement advocates for the repeal of these “tampon taxes” and several class action lawsuits have been filed against states citing equal protection violations. In this article, we use the 2005 elimination of menstrual hygiene products from the sales tax base in New Jersey as a natural experiment to study who benefits from the repeal of tampon taxes. We find that the tax break is fully shifted to consumers, but that the tax break is not distributed equally. Low-income consumers enjoy a benefit from the repeal of the tax by more than the size of the repealed tax. For high-income consumers, the tax break is shared equally with producers. The results suggest that repealing tampon taxes removes an unequal tax burden and could make menstrual hygiene products more accessible for low-income consumers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051524250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051524250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jels.12188
DO - 10.1111/jels.12188
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051524250
SN - 1740-1453
VL - 15
SP - 620
EP - 647
JO - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
JF - Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
IS - 3
ER -