Who cooperates in standards consortia-rivals or complementors?

Justus Baron*, Tim Pohlmann

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Scopus citations


    Formal standard development is increasingly supplemented by standards consortia: Informal and less inclusive alliances, in which firms coordinate standardrelated research and development ("R&D") and streamline standard development. In order to cast light on the economic function of these consortia, this article provides empirical evidence on the standards related to informal consortia, and on the R&D contributions of members and outsiders.We find that standards related to consortia are characterized by a more fragmented ownership of intellectual property rights ("IPR") and a strong degree of technological rivalry. We also find that among the firms contributing to a standard, technological specialists are lesslikely to be member of a consortium. Companies are more likely to be members of the same consortium with companies specializing in R&D that is substitutable rather than complementary to their own patent portfolio. One possible interpretation of these findings is that a main benefit of standards consortia is to reducethe cost of standard development by eliminating wasteful R&D duplication and settling conflicts of interest upfront to formal standardization.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article numbernht034
    Pages (from-to)905-929
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Competition Law and Economics
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Dec 2013

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Law


    Dive into the research topics of 'Who cooperates in standards consortia-rivals or complementors?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this