Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism

Adam Waytz*, John Cacioppo, Nicholas Epley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

762 Scopus citations

Abstract

Anthropomorphism is a far-reaching phenomenon that incorporates ideas from social psychology, cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, and the neurosciences. Although commonly considered to be a relatively universal phenomenon with only limited importance in modern industrialized societies-more cute than critical-our research suggests precisely the opposite. In particular, we provide a measure of stable individual differences in anthropomorphism that predicts three important consequences for everyday life. This research demonstrates that individual differences in anthropomorphism predict the degree of moral care and concern afforded to an agent, the amount of responsibility and trust placed on an agent, and the extent to which an agent serves as a source of social influence on the self. These consequences have implications for disciplines outside of psychology including human-computer interaction, business (marketing and finance), and law. Concluding discussion addresses how understanding anthropomorphism not only informs the burgeoning study of nonpersons, but how it informs classic issues underlying person perception as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-232
Number of pages14
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Funding

We thank Ashley Angulo, Adrianna Guerrero, Mina Kang, Jasmine Kwong, Ye Li, Paul Thomas, Rebecca White, and Louise Hawkley for their assistance, and the Templeton Foundation and Booth School of Business for financial support.

Keywords

  • Anthropomorphism
  • Individual differences
  • Social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this