Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT

Adam Pearson*, Jon Lurie, Tor Tosteson, Wenyan Zhao, William Abdu, James Neil Weinstein

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    93 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Study Design.: Combined prospective randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study of spinal stenosis (SpS) with an as-treated analysis. Objective.: To determine modifiers of the treatment effect (TE) of surgery (the difference between surgical and nonoperative outcomes) for SpS using subgroup analysis. Summary of Backgroumd data.: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial demonstrated a positive surgical TE for SpS at the group level. However, individual characteristics may affect TE. No previous studies have evaluated TE modifiers in SpS. Methods.: SpS patients were treated with either surgery (n = 419) or nonoperative care (n = 235) and were analyzed according to treatment received. Fifty-three baseline variables were used to define subgroups for calculating the time-weighted average TE for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) over 4 years (TE = ΔODIsurgery - ΔODInonoperative). Variables with significant subgroup × treatment interactions (P < 0.05) were simultaneously entered into a multivariate model to select independent TE predictors. Results.: Other than smokers, all analyzed subgroups including at least 50 patients improved significantly more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated: baseline ODI ≤ 56 (TE -15.0 vs. -4.4, ODI > 56, P < 0.001), not smoking (TE -11.7 vs. -1.6 smokers, P < 0.001), neuroforaminal stenosis (TE -14.2 vs. -8.7 no neuroforaminal stenosis, P = 0.002), predominant leg pain (TE -11.5 vs. -7.3 predominant back pain, P = 0.035), not lifting at work (TE -12.5 vs. -0.5 lifting at work, P = 0.017), and the presence of a neurological deficit (TE -13.3 vs. -7.2 no neurological deficit, P < 0.001) were associated with greater TE. Conclusion.: With the exception of smokers, patients who met strict inclusion criteria improved more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment, regardless of other specific characteristics. However, TE varied significantly across certain subgroups, and these data can be used to individualize shared decision making discussions about likely outcomes. Smoking cessation should be considered before surgery for SpS.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1791-1802
    Number of pages12
    JournalSpine
    Volume37
    Issue number21
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Neurology
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this