Why did they "choose" to stay? Perspectives of hurricane katrina observers and survivors

Nicole M. Stephens, Maryam G. Hamedani, Hazel Rose Markus, Hilary B. Bergsieker, Liyam Eloul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Scopus citations

Abstract

Models of agency - powerful implicit assumptions about what constitutes normatively "good" action - shaped how observers and survivors made meaning after Hurricane Katrina. In Study 1, we analyzed how 461 observers perceived survivors who evacuated (leavers) or stayed (stayers) in New Orleans. Observers described leavers positively (as agentic, independent, and in control) and stayers negatively (as passive and lacking agency). Observers' perceptions reflected the disjoint model of agency, which is prevalent in middle-class White contexts and defines "good" actions as those that emanate from within the individual and proactively influence the environment. In Study 2, we examined interviews with 79 survivors and found that leavers and stayers relied on divergent models of agency. Leavers emphasized independence, choice, and control, whereas stayers emphasized interdependence, strength, and faith. Although both leavers and stayers exercised agency, observers failed to recognize stayers' agency and derogated them because observers assumed that being independent and in control was the only way to be agentic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)878-886
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Science
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Why did they "choose" to stay? Perspectives of hurricane katrina observers and survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this