TY - JOUR
T1 - Willing to wait
T2 - Elevated reward-processing EEG activity associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards
AU - Pornpattananangkul, Narun
AU - Nusslock, Robin
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institute of Heath (NIH) Grant T32 NS047987 and Graduate Research Grant from The Graduate School, Northwestern University to NP. RN's contribution to this work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Grants R01 MH100117-01 and R01 MH077908-01A1 , as well as a Young Investigator Grant from the Ryan Licht Sang Bipolar Foundation and the Chauncey and Marion D. McCormick Family Foundation . The authors thank Xiaoqing Hu, J. Peter Rosenfeld and Ken Paller for helpful discussion, Sam Reznik, Daniel O’Leary, Storm Heidinger, Michelle Thai, Jonathan Yu and Ajay Nadig for assisting with data collection, and Rasa Salakij for great emotional support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - While almost everyone discounts the value of future rewards over immediate rewards, people differ in their so-called delay-discounting. One of the several factors that may explain individual differences in delay-discounting is reward-processing. To study individual-differences in reward-processing, however, one needs to consider the heterogeneity of neural-activity at each reward-processing stage. Here using EEG, we separated reward-related neural activity into distinct reward-anticipation and reward-outcome stages using time-frequency characteristics. Thirty-seven individuals first completed a behavioral delay-discounting task. Then reward-processing EEG activity was assessed using a separate reward-learning task, called a reward time-estimation task. During this EEG task, participants were instructed to estimate time duration and were provided performance feedback on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants received monetary-reward for accurate-performance on Reward trials, but not on No-Reward trials. Reward trials, relative to No-Reward trials, enhanced EEG activity during both reward-anticipation (including, cued-locked delta power during cue-evaluation and pre-feedback alpha suppression during feedback-anticipation) and reward-outcome (including, feedback-locked delta, theta and beta power) stages. Moreover, all of these EEG indices correlated with behavioral performance in the time-estimation task, suggesting their essential roles in learning and adjusting performance to maximize winnings in a reward-learning situation. Importantly, enhanced EEG power during Reward trials, as reflected by stronger 1) pre-feedback alpha suppression, 2) feedback-locked theta and 3) feedback-locked beta, was associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards in a separate, behavioral delay-discounting task. Results highlight the association between a stronger preference toward larger-but-delayed rewards and enhanced reward-processing. Moreover, our reward-processing EEG indices detail the specific stages of reward-processing where these associations occur.
AB - While almost everyone discounts the value of future rewards over immediate rewards, people differ in their so-called delay-discounting. One of the several factors that may explain individual differences in delay-discounting is reward-processing. To study individual-differences in reward-processing, however, one needs to consider the heterogeneity of neural-activity at each reward-processing stage. Here using EEG, we separated reward-related neural activity into distinct reward-anticipation and reward-outcome stages using time-frequency characteristics. Thirty-seven individuals first completed a behavioral delay-discounting task. Then reward-processing EEG activity was assessed using a separate reward-learning task, called a reward time-estimation task. During this EEG task, participants were instructed to estimate time duration and were provided performance feedback on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants received monetary-reward for accurate-performance on Reward trials, but not on No-Reward trials. Reward trials, relative to No-Reward trials, enhanced EEG activity during both reward-anticipation (including, cued-locked delta power during cue-evaluation and pre-feedback alpha suppression during feedback-anticipation) and reward-outcome (including, feedback-locked delta, theta and beta power) stages. Moreover, all of these EEG indices correlated with behavioral performance in the time-estimation task, suggesting their essential roles in learning and adjusting performance to maximize winnings in a reward-learning situation. Importantly, enhanced EEG power during Reward trials, as reflected by stronger 1) pre-feedback alpha suppression, 2) feedback-locked theta and 3) feedback-locked beta, was associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards in a separate, behavioral delay-discounting task. Results highlight the association between a stronger preference toward larger-but-delayed rewards and enhanced reward-processing. Moreover, our reward-processing EEG indices detail the specific stages of reward-processing where these associations occur.
KW - Delay discounting
KW - Feedback-locked beta
KW - Frontal midline theta
KW - Pre-stimulus alpha suppression
KW - Reward-processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981498415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981498415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.037
DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 27477630
AN - SCOPUS:84981498415
SN - 0028-3932
VL - 91
SP - 141
EP - 162
JO - Neuropsychologia
JF - Neuropsychologia
ER -