TY - JOUR
T1 - Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech
AU - Grieco-Calub, Tina M.
AU - Simeon, Katherine M.
AU - Snyder, Hillary E.
AU - Lew-Williams, Casey
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the American Hearing Research Foundation and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD079779).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/11/26
Y1 - 2017/11/26
N2 - Spectral degradation reduces access to the acoustics of spoken language and compromises how learners break into its structure. We hypothesised that spectral degradation disrupts word segmentation, but that listeners can exploit other cues to restore detection of words. Normal-hearing adults were familiarised to artificial speech that was unprocessed or spectrally degraded by noise-band vocoding into 16 or 8 spectral channels. The monotonic speech stream was pause-free (Experiment 1), interspersed with isolated words (Experiment 2), or slowed by 33% (Experiment 3). Participants were tested on segmentation of familiar vs. novel syllable sequences and on recognition of individual syllables. As expected, vocoding hindered both word segmentation and syllable recognition. The addition of isolated words, but not slowed speech, improved segmentation. We conclude that syllable recognition is necessary but not sufficient for successful word segmentation, and that isolated words can facilitate listeners’ access to the structure of acoustically degraded speech.
AB - Spectral degradation reduces access to the acoustics of spoken language and compromises how learners break into its structure. We hypothesised that spectral degradation disrupts word segmentation, but that listeners can exploit other cues to restore detection of words. Normal-hearing adults were familiarised to artificial speech that was unprocessed or spectrally degraded by noise-band vocoding into 16 or 8 spectral channels. The monotonic speech stream was pause-free (Experiment 1), interspersed with isolated words (Experiment 2), or slowed by 33% (Experiment 3). Participants were tested on segmentation of familiar vs. novel syllable sequences and on recognition of individual syllables. As expected, vocoding hindered both word segmentation and syllable recognition. The addition of isolated words, but not slowed speech, improved segmentation. We conclude that syllable recognition is necessary but not sufficient for successful word segmentation, and that isolated words can facilitate listeners’ access to the structure of acoustically degraded speech.
KW - Word segmentation
KW - isolated words
KW - noise-band vocoding
KW - spectral degradation
KW - speech rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025434131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025434131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2017.1354129
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2017.1354129
M3 - Article
C2 - 29977950
AN - SCOPUS:85025434131
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 32
SP - 1344
EP - 1356
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 10
ER -