TY - JOUR
T1 - Workforce analysis in orthopaedic surgery
T2 - How can we improve the accuracy of our predictions?
AU - Farley, Frances A.
AU - Weinstein, James Neil
AU - Aamoth, Gordon M.
AU - Shapiro, Matthew S.
AU - Jacobs, Joshua
AU - Mccarthy, Joseph C.
AU - Kramer, Jeffrey
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - Since the 1970s, workforce analysis for orthopaedic surgery has predicted a surplus of physicians into the 21st century. In 1998, the RAND study predicted a surplus of 4,100 orthopaedists in 2010. As we approach 2010, we find no surplus. The projected population growth during the next 20 years of those older than age 65 years presupposes a greater need for orthopaedists, given an increase in degenerative disease and fragility fractures associated with aging. The federal government predicts an overall shortage of physicians by 2020. Given the current nature of workforce analysis models and the concerns evoked by these disparate predictions, we, the authors, advocate change. Rather than large studies separated by decades, we recommend routine monitoring of the orthopaedic workforce. Further, we suggest that national, regional, and local organizations, as well as subspecialty societies, work together to monitor current and future orthopaedic workforce needs. Orthopaedic organizations should develop collaborative relationships with experts in the field and devise a true working model that allows for ongoing strategic planning.
AB - Since the 1970s, workforce analysis for orthopaedic surgery has predicted a surplus of physicians into the 21st century. In 1998, the RAND study predicted a surplus of 4,100 orthopaedists in 2010. As we approach 2010, we find no surplus. The projected population growth during the next 20 years of those older than age 65 years presupposes a greater need for orthopaedists, given an increase in degenerative disease and fragility fractures associated with aging. The federal government predicts an overall shortage of physicians by 2020. Given the current nature of workforce analysis models and the concerns evoked by these disparate predictions, we, the authors, advocate change. Rather than large studies separated by decades, we recommend routine monitoring of the orthopaedic workforce. Further, we suggest that national, regional, and local organizations, as well as subspecialty societies, work together to monitor current and future orthopaedic workforce needs. Orthopaedic organizations should develop collaborative relationships with experts in the field and devise a true working model that allows for ongoing strategic planning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249323043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249323043&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5435/00124635-200705000-00004
DO - 10.5435/00124635-200705000-00004
M3 - Article
C2 - 17478749
AN - SCOPUS:34249323043
SN - 1067-151X
VL - 15
SP - 268
EP - 273
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
IS - 5
ER -