TY - JOUR
T1 - You Can Always Get What You Want
T2 - The Impact of Prior Assumptions on Interpreting GW190412
AU - Zevin, Michael
AU - Berry, Christopher P.L.
AU - Coughlin, Scott
AU - Chatziioannou, Katerina
AU - Vitale, Salvatore
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020, The Authors. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/19
Y1 - 2020/6/19
N2 - GW190412 is the first observation of a black hole binary with definitively unequal masses. GW190412’s mass asymmetry, along with the measured positive effective inspiral spin, allowed for inference of a component black hole spin: the primary black hole in the system was found to have a dimensionless spin magnitude between 0.17 and 0.59 (90% credible range). We investigate how the choice of priors for the spin magnitudes and tilts of the component black holes affect the robustness of parameter estimates for GW190412, and report Bayes factors across a suite of prior assumptions. Depending on the waveform family used to describe the signal, we find either marginal to moderate (2:1–7:1) or strong (& 20:1) support for the primary black hole being spinning compared to cases where only the secondary is allowed to have spin. We show how these choices influence parameter estimates, and find the asymmetric masses and positive effective inspiral spin of GW190412 to be qualitatively, but not quantitatively, robust to prior assumptions. Our results highlight the importance of both considering astrophysically-motivated or population-based priors in interpreting observations, and considering their relative support from the data.
AB - GW190412 is the first observation of a black hole binary with definitively unequal masses. GW190412’s mass asymmetry, along with the measured positive effective inspiral spin, allowed for inference of a component black hole spin: the primary black hole in the system was found to have a dimensionless spin magnitude between 0.17 and 0.59 (90% credible range). We investigate how the choice of priors for the spin magnitudes and tilts of the component black holes affect the robustness of parameter estimates for GW190412, and report Bayes factors across a suite of prior assumptions. Depending on the waveform family used to describe the signal, we find either marginal to moderate (2:1–7:1) or strong (& 20:1) support for the primary black hole being spinning compared to cases where only the secondary is allowed to have spin. We show how these choices influence parameter estimates, and find the asymmetric masses and positive effective inspiral spin of GW190412 to be qualitatively, but not quantitatively, robust to prior assumptions. Our results highlight the importance of both considering astrophysically-motivated or population-based priors in interpreting observations, and considering their relative support from the data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094704507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094704507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094704507
JO - Free Radical Biology and Medicine
JF - Free Radical Biology and Medicine
SN - 0891-5849
ER -