Abstract
In the current issue, Apter and Desselles show that the 8 primary states delineated in reversal theory capture many, if not most, of the different justifications that human beings might offer for engaging in combat. As a general motivational theory, however, reversal theory tends to downplay the group processes that have been invoked throughout history to compel young men to fight wars. Moreover, the fact that it is almost exclusively young men who do the fighting calls for a more thoroughgoing developmental perspective for understanding motivations for war.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 349-350 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Peace and Conflict |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Nov 2019 |
Keywords
- Combat
- Identity
- Motivation
- Reversal theory
- Warfare
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Political Science and International Relations